In late October 2024, the situation was completely separate. Prior to the US presidential election, reflective citizens could admit America's deep flaws – its inequities and imbalance – but they continued to identify it as America. A democracy. A place where the rule of law meant something. A state guided by a dignified and upright public servant, even with his elderly years and increasing frailty.
Currently, this autumn, many of us hardly identify the country we reside in. Persons suspected of being undocumented migrants are collected and pushed into vehicles, occasionally refused legal rights. The East Wing of the White House – is undergoing demolition for a grotesque dance hall. Donald Trump is targeting his political rivals or perceived antagonists and requesting federal prosecutors transfer a huge total of citizen dollars. Soldiers with weapons are deployed into American cities with deceptive justifications. The defense headquarters, rebranded the War Department, has effectively liberated itself of regular press examination as it spends potentially totaling almost one trillion dollars in public funds. Colleges, legal practices, media outlets are yielding under the president’s threats, and billionaires are handled as aristocracy.
“The United States, only a few months ahead of its 250th birthday as the planet's foremost free society, has tipped over the limit into authoritarianism and totalitarianism,” a noted author, stated this past summer. “Ultimately, more quickly than I thought feasible, it transpired here.”
One awakes with fresh terrors. It is challenging to understand – and agonizing to acknowledge – how severely declined we are, and how quickly it has happened.
Yet, we know that the leader was legitimately chosen. Even after his profoundly alarming first term and following the cautions linked to the awareness of the conservative plan – despite Trump himself declared plainly he intended to be a dictator only on the first day – enough Americans selected him over Kamala Harris.
Frightening as the present situation are, it’s even scarier to recognize that we’re only several months into this administration. What will three more years of this downfall position us? And what if the three years turns into an prolonged era, since there is no one to stop this leader from opting that additional tenure is essential, possibly for defense purposes?
Certainly, not everything is hopeless. There are congressional elections the coming year that may establish an alternate balance of power, if Democrats regain one or both houses of the legislature. There exist government representatives who are attempting to impose some accountability, like Democratic congressmen that are starting a probe concerning the try to money grab from the justice department.
And a leadership election in the next cycle could start the path to healing just as the previous vote placed us on this disappointing trajectory.
We see numerous residents protesting in urban areas of their cities, as they did recently at democracy demonstrations.
Robert Reich, commented this week that “the dormant powerhouse of the nation is awakening”, exactly as before post-McCarthyism in that decade or amid the sixties activism or throughout the seventies crisis.
During those times, the tilting vessel ultimately corrected itself.
The author states he knows the signals of that resurgence and notices it unfolding currently. As support, he cites the recent massive protests, the widespread, bipartisan pushback regarding a broadcaster's firing and the largely united defiance by media to sign the defense department’s demands they report only approved content.
“The sleeping giant always remains dormant before specific greed grows too toxic, some action so offensive of societal benefit, specific cruelty so disruptive, that he is compelled other than to stir.”
It's a positive outlook, and I respect his knowledgeable stance. Perhaps he will prove to be right.
At the same time, the major inquiries remain: will the nation regain its footing? Can it retrieve its standing globally and its adherence to constitutional order?
Or do we need to admit that the historical project succeeded temporarily, and then – abruptly, completely – collapsed?
My negative thoughts tells me that the second option is true; that everything might be lost. My hopeful heart, nevertheless, convinces me that we have to attempt, through all methods possible.
For me, as an observer of the press, that means pushing media professionals to adhere, more thoroughly, to their duty of scrutinizing authority. For some people, it may be working on political races, or planning demonstrations, or finding ways to defend electoral access.
Less than a year ago, we existed in a separate situation. A year from now? Or after another term? The fact is, we are uncertain. Our sole course is to attempt to persevere.
The interaction I experience during teaching with new media professionals, that are simultaneously idealistic and realistic, {always
A tech enthusiast and writer passionate about emerging technologies and their impact on society.